The court dismissed an interim application for non-prosecution after the applicant consistently failed to appear despite being granted a last opportunity.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010040682017
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3198/2017 in WP(C) No. 669/2015
MS. HARMEIT KAUR
VERSUS
THE ASSAM BOARD OF REVENUE and 3 ORS
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.R HUSSAIN
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI
ORDER
20-11-2020
None appears for the applicant on call whereas Shri S. Banik, learned counsel for the opposite party / private respondents as well as Ms. M.D. Bora, learned State Counsel are present.
The order sheets reflect that there has been continuous default on the part of the applicant. Such default appears on 16.12.2017, 18.01.2019, 21.10.2020 and 09.11.2020.
On the last date, this Court had observed that a last opportunity be granted and in case of further default, necessary orders would be passed in
Page No.# 2/2
accordance with law.
As observed above, even today none has appeared for the applicant. In that view of the matter, this Court is left with no other option but to dismissed the I/A for non-prosecution.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Ms. Harmeit Kaur
The Assam Board of Revenue and 3 ORS
Sandeep Kumar Medhi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
