The petitioner withdrew the writ petition which was not opposed, and the matter was disposed accordingly without any substantive adjudication.
Withdrawal of writ petition accepted; matter disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010108682020
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C) 3262/2020
1:MWIKHWM OWARY S/O LATE KISHAN OWARY,
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE HATIPOTA, PO DANGAIGAON PS DHALIGAON, DIST CHIRANG BTAD ASSAM
VERSUS
1:THE UNION OF INDIA AND 2 ORS.
THROUGH THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF HUMAN RESOURCE DEPARTMENT SHASTRI BHAWAN, DR RAJENDRA PRASAD ROAD, NEW DELHI
2:THE CENTRAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY KOKRAJHAR REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR BALAJAN DIST KOKRAJHAR BTAD ASSAM 783370
3:FINANCIAL BID EVALUATION COMMITTEE REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN THE REGISTRAR CENTRAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY BALAJAN DIST KOKRAJHAR BTAD ASSAM 78337
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR B D DAS
Advocate for the Respondent : ASSTT.S.G.I.
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM
ORDER
Page No.# 2/2
Date : 05-10-2020
Mr. S.C. Biswas, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has instructions to withdraw this writ petition.
The prayer is not opposed by the learned counsel for the opposite parties.
In view of the above, this matter stands disposed of on withdrawal.
JUDGE GS
Comparing Assistant
Mwikhwm Owary
Union of India
Central Institute of Technology Kokrajhar
Financial Bid Evaluation Committee
Suman Shyam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
