Mir Hussain and Anr. v. the State of Assam
Case brief
What is this about?
An anticipatory bail application was disposed of on withdrawal by the applicant's counsel without opposition from the State.
An anticipatory bail application was disposed of on withdrawal by the applicant's counsel without opposition from the State.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010119372020
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB 2304/2020
1:MIR HUSSAIN AND ANR.
S/O LATE KASHEM ALI, R/O VILL-SUKTATARI, P.S.-BOKO, DISTKAMRUP(R), ASSAM, PIN-781123
2: MINAL HUSSAIN S/O LATE KASHEM ALI R/O VILL-SUKTATARI P.S.-BOKO DIST-KAMRUP(R) ASSAM PIN-78112 VERSUS
1:THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. M AHMED
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM
ORDER
Date : 01-10-2020
Ms. M. Ahmed, learned counsel for the applicant submits that she has instruction to
Page No.# 2/2
withdraw this anticipatory bail application.
The prayer is not opposed by Mr. B.B. Gogoi, learned Addl. P.P. Assam who is present on
behalf of the State.
Mr. N. Uddin, learned counsel is also present and does not oppose the prayer made by the applicant’s counsel.
In view of the above, this anticipatory bail application stands disposed of on withdrawal.
JUDGE GS
Comparing Assistant
MIR HUSSAIN AND ANR.
THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM
SUMAN SHYAM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court