Farzana Parween v. the Bank of India and 2 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Gauhati High Court dismissed a writ petition as infructuous due to the efflux of time. No substantive legal issues were addressed.
The Gauhati High Court dismissed a writ petition as infructuous due to the efflux of time. No substantive legal issues were addressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010015512017
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/1481/2017
FARZANA PARWEEN
W/O MOHAMMAD MURTUZA A RESIDENT OF SAMANNYA HOUSING COMPLEX, BLOCK-C, FLAT NO. 13, BISHNU RABHA PATH, BELTOLA, GUWAHATI - 781028, DIST. KAMRUP, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE BANK OF INDIA and 2 ORS.
THROUGH THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER, NORTH EASTERN REGION G.S. ROAD, CHRISTIAN BASTI, P.O. BHNGAGARH, GUWAHATI - 781005.
2:THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER THE BANK OF INDIA NORTH EASTERN REGION G.R. ROAD CHRISTIAN BASTI P.O. BHANGAGARH GUWAHATI - 781005.
3:THE BRANCH MANAGER
BANK OF INDIA BELTOLA BRANCH BELTOLA TINIALI P.O. BELTOLA GUWAHATI - 781028 ASSA
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.S ALI
Advocate for the Respondent :
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI
ORDER
04-12-2020
Shri N.J. Gogoi, learned counsel appearing on instructions of Shri J.C. Gogoi, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that by efflux of time, the matter has become infructuous.
Accordingly the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
FARZANA PARWEEN
THE BANK OF INDIA
THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER THE BANK OF INDIA
THE BRANCH MANAGER BANK OF INDIA BELTOLA BRANCH
SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court