Dharmananda Upadhyaya v. the Deputy Commissioner and 4 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner withdrew writ petition; disposed of accordingly.
Petitioner withdrew writ petition; disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010046982020
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/1563/2020
DHARMANANDA UPADHYAYA
S/O- LT. GANGARAM UPADHYAYA (INSIDE THE CAMPUS OF NATIONAL H.S. SCHOOL, SANTIPARA, W/NO. 2, LUMDING, DIST.- HOJAI).
VERSUS
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER AND 4 ORS. HOJAI, SANKARDEV NAGAR, DIST.- HOJAI.
2:THE ADDL. DY. COMMISSIONER (EDU)
3:THE CIRCLE OFFICER LANKA REVENUE CIRCLE
4:THE PRESIDENT
5:THE PRINCIPAL (I/C
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. B J GHOSH
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM
ORDER
Date : 09/11/2020
Page No.# 2/2
Mr. Dilip Dey, learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner submits that he has instruction from his client to withdraw this writ petition.
Ms. K. Phukan, learned Government Advocate, Assam, appearing for the respondent nos. 1, 2 and 3 and Mr. K. Brook, learned counsel representing the respondent nos. 4 and 5, do not have any objection if the prayer is allowed.
In view of the above, this writ petition stands disposed of on withdrawal.
JUDGE
Sukhamay
Comparing Assistant
Dharmmanda Upadhyaya
The Deputy Commissioner and 4 Ots
Suman Shyam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court