Vickey Dolo v. the State of Ap
Case brief
What is this about?
The Gauhati High Court quashed an FIR and Charge Sheet registered under Sections 498A and 323 of the IPC, as well as mentioned Sections 498A and 323 of the IPC.
What did the court decide?
F.I.R. No. 89/2019 and corresponding Charge-Sheet under Sections 498(A)/323 of the IPC are quashed and the criminal petition disposed of.
What the court decided
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC040008532020
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : Crl.Petn. 36/2020
1:Vickey Dolo
S/O SHRI GYAMYANG PANGIA, PERMANENT RESIDENT OF SEPPA, PO/PS SEPPA, EAST KAMENG DISTRICTD, AP.PRESENTLY RESIDING AT P SECTOR, ITANAGAR, PO/PS ITANAGAR, PAPUM PARE DISTRICT, AP.
2: RUJA MAGA W/O SHRI VICKEY DOLO RESIDENT OF P SECTOR ITANAGAR PO/PS ITANAGAR PAPUM PARE AP
VERSUS
1:THE STATE OF AP
THROUGH THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR.
Advocate for the Petitioner : T Lamnio
Advocate for the Respondent : P P of AP
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the FIR and Charge Sheet under Sections 498(A) and 323 of the IPC should be quashed under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C.
Whether there is a prima facie case of cruelty under Section 498(A) IPC given the allegations and evidence.
Whether the possibility of future conviction exists in cases involving domestic assault without dowry demand.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Vickey Dolo
- petitioner
Ruja Maga
- respondent
The State of AP
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Gauhati HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- Crl.Petn./36/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court