Badsha Ali @ Badsha Sk. v. the State of Assam
Case brief
What is this about?
Single judge rejected the petitioner's application for pre-arrest bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in a murder case. The court held that evidence in the case diary showed apparent complicity, making it unfit for bail.
What did the court decide?
Prayer for pre-arrest bail rejected; anticipatory bail application disposed of.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010110612020
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB 2157/2020
1:BADSHA ALI @ BADSHA SK. S/O LT. HOROP ALI, VILL. RAKHALDUBI, P.O. JOYPUR BAZAR, P.S. BAGUAN, DIST. GOALPARA ASSAM, PIN-783129
VERSUS
1:THE STATE OF ASSAM REP.BY THE PP, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. N UDDIN
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HITESH KUMAR SARMA
ORDER
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is fit for grant of pre-arrest bail in a case concerning manslaughter and injury.
Whether the complicity of the petitioner in the alleged offence is apparent from the case diary.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Badsha Ali @ Badsha Sk.
- respondent
The State of Assam
Coram
Hitesh Kumar Sarma
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Gauhati HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- AB/2157/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court