Intaj Ali v. the State of Assam
Case brief
What is this about?
This single-paragraph order of the Gauhati High Court rejected the applicant's application for pre-arrest bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. The court found serious allegations against the applicant substantiated by evidence in the case diary, specifically assaulting police officers and snatching a pistol, including during an investigation under Section 379 IPC and Section 21(c) NDPS Act.
What did the court decide?
Prayer for pre-arrest bail rejected; anticipatory bail application disposed of.
What the court decided
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010073082020
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB 1199/2020
1:INTAJ ALI
S/O LT. AJIMUDDIN, R/O MAHKHULI, P.S. SADAR DIST. NAGAON, ASSAM
VERSUS
1:THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MS J BORAH
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HITESH KUMAR SARMA
ORDER
Date : 07-10-2020
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to pre-arrest bail.
Whether the serious allegations against the applicant substantiated by evidence warrant a grant of bail.
What is the outcome of the pre-arrest bail application.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Intaj Ali
- respondent
The State of Assam
Coram
Hitesh Kumar Sarma
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Gauhati HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- AB/1199/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court