In this bail application, the petitioner appeared without counsel despite a prior notice. The court dismissed the application due to the petitioner's non-prosecution and without hearing, directing the return of the case diary.
Bail application dismissed for non-prosecution; case diary directed to be returned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/1
GAHC010103312020
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB/1891/2020
JHOLMOL DUTTA
S/O. NIRMAL KANTI DUTTA, R/O. CONVENT ROAD, P.O. AND P.S. HAFLONG, DIST. DIMA HASAO, ASSAM.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY PP, ASSAM.
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S C BISWAS
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM
BEFORE
HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE RUMI KUMARI PHUKAN
:: O R D E R ::
05-11-2020
None appears for the petitioner and even in the last week also he was not represented. Accordingly, this bail application stands dismissed for non-prosecution. Return the case diary.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a bail application should be dismissed when the petitioner is absent and unrepresented.
Jholmol Dutta
The State of Assam
Rumi Kumari Phukan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
