Jagadish Oja v. the State of Assam
Case brief
What is this about?
Disposes of pre-arrest bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. The High Court rejected the plea, holding that gross irregularities and apparent complicity in misappropriating government welfare funds make it an unfit case for privilege bail.
What did the court decide?
Application for pre-arrest bail rejected; case disposed of; interim order vacated.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010080032020
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB/1347/2020
JAGADISH OJA
S/O- NABIN OJA, R/O- VILL- HAJO BHARALITOLA, PS-HAJO, DISTKAMRUP(R) ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. PP ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR S DAS
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM
BEFORE
HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE RUMI KUMARI PHUKAN
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to pre-arrest bail in a corruption case involving misappropriation of government funds.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
JAGADISH OJA
- respondent
THE STATE OF ASSAM
Coram
RUMI KUMARI PHUKAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Gauhati HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- AB/1347/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court