Nang Gao v. The State of Ap
Case brief
What is this about?
The Gauhati High Court allowed a petition for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. The court held that custodial interrogation was not necessary prima facie. Bail was granted with a bond and specific conditions.
What did the court decide?
Pre-arrest bail allowed on furnishing of a bail bond of Rs 20,000 with one surety of like amount.
What the court decided
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC040001102020
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : AB 13/2020
1:Nang Gao S/o Late Durga Gao, P/R/O Sika Bamin Village, PO Sille Oyan, East Siang District, AP
VERSUS
1:The State of AP represented by the PP of AP, Naharlagun
Advocate for the Petitioner : T T Tara
Advocate for the Respondent : P P of AP
BEFORE
HONBLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA
ORDER
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. should be granted to the petitioner in a case involving armed assault and possession of arms allegations.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Nang Gao S/o Late Durga Gao
- respondent
The State of AP
Coram
Kalyan Rai Surana
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Gauhati HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- AB/13/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court