It is contended that petitioners do not have equal bargaining power vis-a-vis respondents. Taking advantage of unequal bargaining power, respondents have arbitrarily fixed excessive rent for the premises, which the petitioners had to accept, they having no other alternative. In this connection, learned counsel for the petitioners has referred to rents fixed at Siliguri and at Kanpur. Mr. Hussain has also referred to provisions of the Assam Agricultural Produce Market Act, 1972 and contends that such arbitrary and irrational fixation of rent is not permissible. He has also referred to a decision of the Supreme Court in Balmer Lawrie & Company Ltd. Vs. Partha Sarathi Sen Roy , reported in (2013) 8 SCC 345 .