Suchitra Chandra Talukdar v. the State of Assam and 4 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
GAHC010153262019 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT…
GAHC010153262019 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010153262019
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C) 5028/2019
1:SUCHITRA CHANDRA TALUKDAR
S/O- LATE NABIN CHANDRA TALUKDAR, R/O- KAMAKHYA NAGAR, ADABARI TINIALI, BYE LANE NO. 5, H /NO. 10, P.O- PANDU, P.SJALUKBARI, DIST- KAMRUP(M), ASSAM, PIN- 781012
VERSUS
1:THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM, PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPTT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI- 6
2:THE JOINT SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPTT DISPUR GUWAHATI
3:THE COMMISSIONER P AND RD JURIPAR PANJABARI GHY- 37
4:THE CEO ZILLA PARISHAD KAMRUP(R) AMINGAON GHY- 31
5:THE BDO BONGAON DEVELOPMENT BLOCK BONGAON DIST- KAMRUP(R) ASSAM, PIN- 78102
Page No.# 2/2
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S C BISWAS
Advocate for the Respondent : SC, PNRD
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN
ORDER
Date : 13-09-2019
Heard Mr. A. Borah, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. A. Roy, learned counsel for Panchayat and Rural Development Department, Government of Assam.
In this writ petition, petitioner has assailed legality and correctness of the notification dated 26.06.2018 issued by the Secretary to the Government of Assam, Panchayat and Rural Development Department placing the petitioner under suspension in view of his arrest on 24.05.2018 in connection with a criminal case and being in detention for more than 48 hours.
Petitioner is a Junior Engineer in the Bongaon Development Block, Kamrup.
Today when the matter is called upon, learned counsel for the parties have apprised the Court that petitioner has been reinstated in service.
In that view of the matter, no live issue survives for adjudication in this case.
Consequently, writ petition is closed.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
SUCHITRA CHANDRA TALUKDAR
THE STATE OF ASSAM
UJJAL BHUYAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court