Inevidence of the order passed today in CRP 164/2011, this miscellaneous case (MC 1915/2011) stands closed. The judgment is a one-line adjournment order with no substantive legal proposition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/1
GAHC010194032011
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : MC 1915/2011
1:PURSOTTAM LAL SHARMA
VERSUS
1:KAILASH CHAND SHARMA @ JOSHI Advocate for the Petitioner : MS.R LAHKAR Advocate for the Respondent : MS.K YADAV
Linked Case : CRP 164/2011
1:KAILASH CHAND SHARMA @ JOSHI
S/O LT.RAMJILAL SHARMA, R/O "SHARMA SADAN", TOKOBARI, GHY-1, IN THE DIST OF KAMRUP ASSAM
VERSUS
1:PURSOTTAM LAL SHARMA
KARTA OF M/S PURSOTTAMLAL SHARMA, H.U.F., S/O LT. BIRDHICHAND SHARMA, R/O M.S. ROAD, FANCY BAZAR, GHY-1, ALSO AT "SHARMA SADAN" TOKOBARI, FANCY BAZAR, GHY-1 IN THE DIST OF KAMRUP ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.B K JAIN Advocate for the Respondent : FOR CAVEATOR
:: BEFORE ::
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASANTA KUMAR DEKA
-O R D E R-
24.10.2019
In view of the order passed today in CRP 164/2011, this miscellaneous case stands closed.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
PURSOTTAM LAL SHARMA
KAILASH CHAND SHARMA @ JOSHI
PRASANTA KUMAR DEKA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
