The Gauhati High Court dismissed an appeal for non-prosecution as the appellant did not appear on scheduled dates despite previous notices.
The appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010006032009
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : RSA 142/2009
1:BIJOY KR. PATOA and 2ORS
2: AJAY KR. PATOA
BOTH ARE SONS OF LATE DEORAJ PATOA ITKHOLA SILCHAR-2 DIST. CACHAR ASSAM
VERSUS
1:SUMITRA PATOA and 4ORS W/O LATE BHIMRAJ PATOA.
2:MANJU KUMAR PATOA
3:CHANDRA KR. PATOA.
4:JAYANTA KUMAR PATOA
5:SMT. CHANDRA KANTA PATOA LAL RESPONDENTS/PLAINTIFF NO-2 TO 4 ARE SONS AND RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF NO-5 IS DAUGHTER OF LATE BHIMRAJ PATOA WHO IS ALSO WIFE OF JAGADISH PRASAD LAL. ALL ARE RESIDENT OF ITKHOLA SILCHAR TOWN PARGANA BORAKPUR P.S. SILCHAR TOWN P.O. SILCHAR-2
Page No.# 2/3
DIST. CACHAR ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : A WAHAB
Advocate for the Respondent : MS.J GOGOIR-3,4and5
Linked Case : I.A. 1730/2015
1:BIJOY KR. PATOA and 2ORS
VERSUS
1:SUMITRA PATOA and 4ORS
Advocate for the Petitioner : N AHMED Advocate for the Respondent : MR.D C C PHUKANR-3 4and5
BEFORE
CIVIL BENCH-I
ORDER
Date : 22-10-2019
No one appears for the appellant on call.
It is seen that no one had appeared for the appellant on the last three Court’s dates as well, i.e. on 18.06.2019, 17.08.2019 and 19.09.2019.
The appellant does not seem to be interested in pursuing this matter.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Page No.# 3/3
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
BIJOY KR. PATOA and 2 ORS
SUMITRA PATOA and 4 ORS
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
