A review petition in a criminal matter was disposed of as not pressed after the petitioner sought a withdrawal citing the matter as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010245422019
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Crl.Rev.P. 434/2019
1:SATRUGHAN SAH
S/O ARJUN SAH, R/O GABHARUPATHER TINIALI NALIAPOOL, P.O. AND P.S. AND DIST-DIBRUGARH, ASSAM, PIN-786001
VERSUS
1:THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR. REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM
2:NUMAL BARUAH ASSISTANT SUB INSPECTOR GABHARUPATHAR POLICE OUTPOST DIBRUGARH DIST -DIBRUGARH (ASSAM) PIN-786001 (INFORMANT
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S R GOGOI
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM
BEFORE
HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE RUMI KUMARI PHUKAN
O R D E R
29-10-2019.
It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the matter has become infructuous and so they intend to withdraw the petition.
Page No.# 2/2
JUDGE
The petition stands disposed of accordingly as not pressed.
Comparing Assistant
SATRUGHAN SAH
THE STATE OF ASSAM
RUMI KUMARI PHUKAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
