Reshenaro v. L. Kire,Ifs and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
In contempt proceedings alleging non-compliance of a writ disposal order regarding compassionate appointment, the Court noted that the respondents had informed the petitioner of her position on the waiting list, thereby satisfying the direction to dispose of her representation. The petition was closed.
What did the court decide?
Petition stands closed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC020003982019
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) KOHIMA BENCH
Case No. : COP(C) 32/2019
1:RESHENARO
KHENSA VILLAGE, MOKOKCHUNG, N/L
VERSUS
1:L. KIRE,IFS AND ANR
COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF N/L, WORKS AND HOUSING DEPT., N/L, KOHIMA
2:LIMADONGDANG ENGINEER-IN-CHIEF
PWD N/L KOHIM
Advocate for the Petitioner : SUPONGWATI WALLING
Advocate for the Respondent :
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the respondents complied with the High Court direction to consider the petitioner's representation for compassionate appointment.
What order is passed in the contempt proceedings when the impugned direction is found to be complied with.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Reshenaro
- respondent
L. Kire, IFS
- respondent
Limadongdong
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Gauhati HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- COP(C)/32/2019
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court