India Brahma and Anr. v. Biren Chandra Phukan, IAS
Case brief
What is this about?
Contempt petition closed as the order of the writ court was found to have been complied with.
What did the court decide?
Contempt petition closed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010096602019
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C) 250/2019
1:INDIA BRAHMA AND ANR. S/O. LT. NINAN BRAHMA, R/O. ALENGMARI (SONAPUR), P.O. DUMARIGURI, DIST. KOKRAJHAR, ASSAM.
2: BIMAL CHANRA NARZARY S/O. SRI PURNA CHANDRA NARZARY R/O. RUPNAGAR KOKRAJHAR TOWN WARD NO.4 P.O. KOKRAJHAR BTC ASSAM
VERSUS
1:BIREN CHANDRA PHUKAN, IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, BTC, KOKRAJHAR.
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. B P BORAH
Advocate for the Respondent : MR. A K BHUYAN
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
India Brahma & Anr.
- respondent
Biren Chandra Phukan
Coram
Ujjal Bhuyan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Gauhati HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- Cont.Cas(C)/250/2019
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court