Appeals filed by a construction firm against an arbitral award were dismissed as not pressed, after the parties reached a compromise and instructed counsel not to pursue the matter.
Appeals dismissed as not pressed. LCRs sent back.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010032042016
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Arb.A. 17/2016
1:M/S AMAR CONSTRUCTION COMPANY and 2 ORS
A REGISTERED PARTNERSHIP FIRM HAVING ITS HEAD OFFICE AT 438, ADISONS ARCADE, FRASER ROAD, PATNA 800001 BIHAR AND OFFICE AT ADISONS COMPLEX, VILL. BAMHUKUTA, P.O. and P.S. DULIAJAN-786602, DIST. DIBRUGARH, ASSAM.
2: ABHISHEK SINGH S/O SRI ASHOK SINGH PARTNER OF M/S AMAR CONSTRUCTION CO. FLAT NO. 503 PUSHPADHAR APARTMENTS CHOWKINDINGHEE DIBRUGARH TOWN P.O. DIBRUGARH POIN 786001O P.S. and DIST. DIBRUGARH ASSAM.
3: ASHOK SINGH
S/O LATE AMARDEO SINGH PARTNER OF M/S AMAR CONSTRUCTION CO. FLAT NO. 503 PUSHPADHAR APARTMENTS CHOWKINDINGHEE DIBRUGARH TOWN P.O. DIBRUGARH PIN 786001 P.S. and DIST. DIBRUGARH ASSAM
VERSUS
1:SRI BIKASH AGARWALLA
S/O SRI MANIRAM AGARWALLA, R/O ROTARY ROAD, DIBRUGARH TOWN, P.O. , P.S. and DIST. DIBRUGARH, PIN 786001, ASSAM.
Page No.# 2/3
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.S DUTTA
Advocate for the Respondent :
Linked Case : Arb.A. 14/2016
1:M/S AMAR CONSTRUCTION COMPANY and 2 ORS A REGISTERED PARTNERSHIP FIRM HAVING ITS HEAD OFFICE AT 438 ADISONS ARCADE FRASER ROAD PATNA 800001 BIHAR AND OFFICE AT ADISONS COMPLEX VILL. BAMHUKUTA P.O. and P.S. DULIAJAN 786602 DIST. DIBRUGARH ASSAM.
VERSUS 1:SMTI SMITA AGARWALLA W/O SRI BIKASH AGARWALLA R/O ROTARY ROAD DIBRUGARH TOWN P.O. P.S. and DIST. DIBRUGARH PIN 786001 ASSAM REPRESENTED BY HER ATTORNEY SRI BIKASH AGARWALLA
Advocate for the Petitioner : MS.N MODI Advocate for the Respondent :
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM
ORDER
13.03.2019
Mr. C. Sharma, learned counsel for the appellants, submits that the
dispute has been compromised by and between the parties and therefore, he
Page No.# 3/3
has instructions not to press this appeal.
I have also heard Mr. R. S. Mishra, learned counsel for the respondent,
who confirms the submission made by the appellants’ counsel.
In view of the above, these appeals stand dismissed as not pressed.
Send back the LCRs.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
M/s Amar Construction Company and 2 ORS
Sri Bikash Agarwalla and 1 ORS
Suman Shyam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
