The petitioner filed a petition seeking interim pre-arrest bail but expired before judgment. The court held the petition infructuous and closed it, vacating the interim pre-arrest bail order.
dismissed the petition as infructuous; vacated interim pre-arrest bail order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/1
GAHC010257512019
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB 3695/2019
1:FORIJAL HOQUE
S/O- LATE IZZAT ALI, VILLAGE- HARIRCHAR PART-II, P.S. MERERCHAR, DIST. BONGAIGAON, ASSAM.
VERSUS
1:THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM.
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S MUNIR
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT BORTHAKUR
ORDER
Date : 04-12-2019
Heard Mr. S. Rana, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. B.J. Dutta, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam appearing for the State respondent.
Mr. S. Rana, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the instant petition has become infructuous as the petitioner expired in the last week.
In view of the above, the petition stands closed. The interim pre-arrest bail granted to the petitioner vide order, dated 25.10.2019 stands vacated.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
FORIJAL HOQUE
THE STATE OF ASSAM
AJIT BORTHAKUR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
