Md. Saddam Hussain v. the State of Assam and 6 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
This order holds that the writ petition has become infructuous. The court disposed of the matter without further orders in the provided text.
This order holds that the writ petition has become infructuous. The court disposed of the matter without further orders in the provided text.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010023062016
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C) 4919/2016
1:MD. SADDAM HUSSAIN
S/O- MD. ALAUDDIN, R/O VILL.- PAGHALI, P.O.- MUAMARA, P.S.SAMAGURI, DIST.- NAGAON, ASSAM.
VERSUS
1:THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS
REP. BY THE PRINCIPAL SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPTT., DISPUR, GHY- 6.
2:THE COMMISSIONER PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPTT. JURIPAR PANJABARI GHY- 37.
3:THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER NAGAON ZILA PARISHAD P.O. and DIST.- NAGAON ASSAM.
4:THE PRESIDENT STANDING COMMITTEE NAGAON ZILA PARISHAD P.O. and DIST.- NAGAON ASSAM.
5:THE PRESIDENT BAJIAGAON ANCHALIK PANCHAYAT P.O. DIST.- NAGAON ASSAM.
6:ZAKIR HUSSAIN
Page No.# 2/2
S/O- LT. ABDUL MAZID R/O VILL.- TEKELIPUTA P.O.- MUAMARI P.S. - SAMAGURI DIST.- NAGAON ASSAM PIN- 782140
Advocate for the Petitioner : MRJ C BORAH Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM
:: BEFORE ::
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASANTA KUMAR DEKA
-O R D E R-
03.04.2018
Heard Mr. JC Borah, learned counsel for the petitioner who submits that the matter raised in this writ petition, has become infructuous. Considering the same, this writ petition is disposed of as the same has become infructuous.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Md. Saddam Hussain
The State of Assam
Prasanta Kumar Deka
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court