The Gauhati High Court allowed an interlocutory application seeking substitution of respondent No. 4, who had expired, with his legal heirs, Om Prakash Pandit and Jai Prakash Pandit.
The prayer for substitution of respondent No. 4 with his legal heirs is allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/1
GAHC010031032017
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil) 2454/2017
In WP(C) No. 5549 of 2008
1:SMTI. SHANTI BHUYAN BARMAN
VERSUS
1:THE CHAIRMAN ASSAM BOARD OF REVENUE and ORS.
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.H K DEKA
Advocate for the Respondent : G UDDIN
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN
ORDER
Date : 09-11-2018
Heard Mr N Choudhury, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr G Uddin, learned counsel, appearing for respondent Nos. 4 (i), 4 (ii), 5 and 6.
Office Note dated 31.10.2018 indicates that the above respondents have been served, who are now represented by Mr G Uddin, learned counsel.
This application has been filed for substitution of respondent No. 4, who has since expired by his legal heirs, i.e., respondent Nos. 4 (i) Om Prakash Pandit and 4 (ii) Jai Prakash Pandit, both sons of Pancham Pandit.
After hearing learned counsel for the parties and on going through the materials on record, prayer made is allowed.
Interlocutory Application is disposed of.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application for substitution of respondent No. 4 with his legal heirs should be allowed.
Smti. Shanti Bhuyan Barman
The Chairman Assam Board of Revenue and Ors.
Om Prakash Pandit
Jai Prakash Pandit
Ujjal Bhuyan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
