M/S Raitani Engineering Works Pvt. Ltd. v. the Union of India and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
This order grants an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for appointment of an arbitrator. The Court held the dispute maintainable and directed closing of proceedings as arbitral proceedings had already commenced.
What did the court decide?
Application under Section 11 dismissed as arbitral proceedings commenced; no further order called for.
What the court decided
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010016722017
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Arb.P. 11/2017
1:M/S RAITANI ENGINEERING WORKS PVT. LTD.
A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE INDAIN COMPANIES ACT, 1956, HAVING ITS HEAD OFFICE AT CAMPUS OF M.M. CHAUDHURY, P.B. ROAD, REHABARI, GUWAHATI-781008, ASSAM REP. BY ONE OF ITS DIRECTORS SHRI MAYUR RAITANI, S/O. SRI ANAND RAM RAITANI, R/O. 4TH FLOOR, NIRMAL SAGAR APARTMENT, OLD POST OFFICE LANE, REHABARI, GUWAHATI-781008
VERSUS
1:THE UNION OF INDIA and ANR.
REP. BY THE GENERAL MANAGER CONSTRUCTION, N.F. RAILWAY, MALIGAON, GUWAHATI-781011, ASSAM.
2:THE CHIEF ENGINEER/ CON-I N.F. RAILWAY MALIGAON GUWAHATI-781011 ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MS.M JAIN
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the dispute arising from the contract between the petitioner and respondent regarding construction work is maintainable for arbitration under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act
Parties & counsel
- applicant
M/s Raitani Engineering Works Pvt. Ltd.
- respondent
The Union of India
- respondent
The Chief Engineer/ Con-I N.F. Railway Maligaon
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Gauhati HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- Arb.P./11/2017
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court