Disposed
Union Bank of India v. Vinayak
DRTTA/91/2024
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Disposed
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
| 09.01.2026 | Exh. | Roznama-MDRT-II T.O.A. No.91 of 2024 |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ms Nasima Siddiqui i/b M/s. M.V. Kini & Co., Advocate for the Applicant. None for Defendants. |
|||
| rst - 20 | Applicant Bank has filed Withdrawal Application I.A. No.73 of 2026 supported by affidavit for withdrawal of the T.O.A. No.91 of 2024. Ld. Advocate for the Applicant submits that the matter has been amicably settled with the Defendants for a sum of Rs.23,00,000/- and now, the Applicant wants to withdraw the present T.O.A. In view of the above submissions, the withdrawal of I.A. No.73 of 2026 is allowed. Resultantly, T.O.A. No.91 of 2024 stands disposed of as withdrawn. The Applicant shall be entitled to refund of court fees as per Rules. File be consigned to the Record Room after due compliance. Sd/- P.O. DRT-II |
Closed |
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- other
Ms Nasima Siddiqui i/b M/s. M.V. Kini & Co., Advocate for the Applicant
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court