Disposed
shree sharda industries Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. v. sicom limited
DRTSA/133/2025
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Withdrawal Application allowed; Special Appeal disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| 09.01.2026 | Esh. | Roznama-MDRT-II S.A. No.133 of 2025 |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mr Rajesh Nagori and Mr Mohit Jain, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr Abhijit Pawar i/b Mr Sunil Kadam, Advocate for Respondents. |
|||
| 10 | Ld. Advocate for the Applicant has filed Withdrawal Application I.A. No.80 of 2026 supported by affidavit (exhibit-10) for withdrawal of the S.A. No.133 of 2025. Ld. Advocate for the Applicant submits that the Applicant does not want to prosecute |
||
| rst-21 | with the matter due to change in circumstances and hence, seeks for withdrawal of the present S.A. In view of the submission made by the Ld. Advocate for the Applicant, I.A. No.80 of 2026 is allowed. Resultantly, S.A. No.133 of 2025 stands disposed of as withdrawn. Pending IAs, if any, stands disposed of. File be consigned to the Record Room after due compliance. Sd/- P.O. DRT-II |
Closed |
Applicant
Respondents
P.O.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court