Disposed
Axis Bank v. Padmesh Gupta
DRTTA/207/2023
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Court dismissed the matter ex-parte against Defendants Nos.4 and 5 due to non-appearance. Defendants Nos.1 to 3 were permitted adjournment to 18.02.2026 after filing written statement.
What did the court decide?
Matter listed on 18.02.2026; Defendants 4 and 5 set ex-parte.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
| 20.01.2026 | Exh. | Roznama-MDRT-II T.O.A. No.207 of 2023 |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ms Aneri Shah i/b M/s. V. Deshpande & Co., Advocate for the Applicant. Mr Nikhil Mhatre, Advocate for Defendant Nos.1 to 3. None for Defendant Nos.4 and 5. Despite service, no representation is |
|||
| Sris-34 | 14 | made by the Defendants either personally or through Advocate or through VC. Hence, they are now set ex-parte. Ld. Advocate for Defendant Nos.1 to 3 filed written statement (exhibit-14). Now, list this matter on 18.02.2026 for hearing. Sd/- P.O. DRT-II |
18.02.2026 |
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Applicant
- respondent
Defendant Nos.1 to 3
- respondent
Defendant Nos.4 and 5
Coram
AI extract
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court