Dismissed
Nainesh Sanghavi HUF v. Nkgsb Cooperative Bank Ltd.
DRTMA/93/2025
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Dismissed
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| 19.01.2026 | Exh. | Roznama-MDRT-II M.A. No.93 of 2025 |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mr Ram Upadhyay (through VC), Advocate for the Applicant. Mr Mohit Shamdasani, Advocate for the Defendant. |
|||
| rst – 22 | Ld. Advocate for the Applicant submits that the Applicant got the possession of the concerned flat along with documents and sale certificate. The Applicant does not wish to proceed with this M.A. and may be disposed of. In view of the submission made by Ld. Advocate for the Applicant, the present M.A. No.93 of 2025 stands dismissed with no order as to costs. File be consigned to the Record Room after due compliance. Sd/- P.O. DRT-II |
Closed |
Subhash Chandra Jajodia vs. P.O.
S. Garg vs. P.O.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court