The court dismissed and disposed of a case for want of representation by the Applicant, who appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter.
Dismissal and disposal of the case for want of representation by the Applicant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| 03.02.2026 | Exh. | Roznama-MDRT-II T.O.A. No.169 of 2023 |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| None for the parties. | |||
| rst – 19 | Order-sheet maintained by the learned Registrar dated 08.01.2026 shows that no representation was made by the parties. Even today, no representation is made by the Applicant either personally or through the Advocate or through VC. It appears that the Applicant is not interested in pursuing this case any further. So, T.O.A. No.169 of 2023 stands dismissed and disposed of accordingly. Pending IAs, if any, stands disposed of. File be consigned to the Record Room after due compliance. Sd/- P.O. DRT-II |
Closed |
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
