Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur dismissed an application (SA/92/2024) filed by MS KRISHNA DISTRIBUTORS against State Bank of India in default because no party appeared on behalf of the applicant despite notice.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 50
Case No.SA/92/2024
MS KRISHNA DISTRIBUTORS Vs STATE BANK OF INDIA
Date: 05.03.2026.
Proceedings through hybrid mode Present:
None for the Applicant
Ms. Praneeta Agarwal, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI
None appeared on behalf of the applicant despite Passover.
In view of the above, SA stands disposed of as dismissed in default.
File be consigned to record as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
cm
MS KRISHNA DISTRIBUTORS
STATE BANK OF INDIA
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
