Amin Ali Nagori v. Bank of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
No appearance for the applicant. The Debt Recovery Tribunal disposed of the Securitization Application as infructuous.
What did the court decide?
Securitization Application disposed of as infructuous.
What the court decided
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 37
Case No. SA/915/2025
AMIN ALI NAGORI Vs BANK OF MAHARASHTRA
Date: 16.04.2026.
Proceedings through hybrid mode Present:
None for the Applicant
Smt. Surbhi Bairathi, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI
Ld. Counsel for the respondent bank submitted that account stands closed and she prayed that the SA may be disposed of as infructuous.
Considering the submissions made by Ld. Counsel for the respondent bank and also considering the fact that none appeared on behalf of the SA applicant, this Securitization Application stands disposed of as infructuous.
File be consigned to record, as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Parties & counsel
- applicant
AMIN ALI NAGORI
- respondent
BANK OF MAHARASHTRA
Coram
Vimal Gupta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court