Single-bench order disposing Special Appeal No.84 of 2025 before the Debt Recovery Tribunal-II. Court held that the appellant's objection is no longer tenable since the respondent bank has withdrawn measures under the SARFAESI Act.
Special Appeal No.84 of 2025 stands disposed of
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| 24.02.2026 | Exh. | Roznama-MDRT-II S.A. No.84 of 2025 |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ms Sharanya Shivaraman i/b M/s. Meraki Chambers, Advocate for the Applicant. |
|||
| Mr Vinod Nagula, Ms Savita Nangare and Ms Disha Shah i/b M/s. Law Focus, Advocates for Respondent. |
|||
| Ld. Advocate for the Applicant submits that overdue amount has already been paid to the Respondent Bank and in future, the Applicant shall pay regularly the EMIs. |
|||
| Ld. Advocate for Respondent submits that Respondent Bank has withdrawn all the measures under the SARFAESI Act and nothing remains in the present S.A. Heard Ld. Advocates for the parties. In view of submissions made by Ld. Advocates, nothing survives in the present S.A. |
Page 1 of 2
Hence, S.A. No.84 of 2025 stands
disposed of.
File be consigned to the Record
Room after due compliance.
Sd/-
P.O.
Closed
DRT-II
rst – 15
Page 2 of 2
Sharanya Shivaraman
Respondent Bank
Unknown
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
