The Special Application filed by the Applicant seeking to quash proceedings was withdrawn upon the parties stating the matter was amicably settled and the account was closed. The withdrawal application was allowed.
Withdrawal of S.A. No.305 of 2024 allowed; matter stands disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| 23.02.2026 | Esh. | Roznama-MDRT-II S.A. No.305 of 2024 |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8 9 |
Mr V.N. Ajikumar i/b M/s. VNA Legal, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr Parth Shah i/b M/s. Fortis India Law, Advocate for Respondent No.1. None for Respondents. Ld. Advocate for the Applicant filed Withdrawal Application I.A. No.481 of 2026 supported by affidavit (exhibit-8) for withdrawal of the S.A. No.305 of 2024. Ld. Advocate for Respondent No.1 filed pursis (exhibit-9) saying that NOC has already been issued. Ld. Advocate for the Applicant submits that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and account has been closed. Now, the Applicant does not want to prosecute with this S.A. Hence, seeks for withdrawal of the present S.A. In view of the submission made by the Ld. Advocate for the Applicant, I.A. No.481 of 2026 is allowed. Resultantly, S.A. No.305 of 2024 |
Page 1 of 2
| stands disposed of as withdrawn. | ||
|---|---|---|
| File be consigned to the Record Room after due compliance. |
Closed |
|
| Sd/- | ||
| rst-36 | P.O. DRT-II |
Page 2 of 2
Applicant
Respondent No.1
Sd/-
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
