This court disposed of Special Appeal No.72 of 2022 on 24.04.2026 after recording consent terms filed by advocates, holding that the matter was amicably settled with no surviving issues.
Special Appeal No.72 of 2022 and pending IAs were disposed of following consent terms filed by advocates.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| 24.04.2026 | Exh. | Roznama-MDRT-II S.A. No.72 of 2022 |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mr Puneet Gogad, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr Neelanshu Roy i/b M/s. Sirius Legal, Advocate for Respondent. |
|||
| 24 | Ld. Advocate for the Applicant filed consent terms (exhibit-24), which is taken on record. Ld. Advocate for the parties submits that the matter has been amicably settled as per consent terms (exhibit-24) and further submits that nothing survives in this S.A. In view of above submissions and consent terms (exhibit-24) filed, S.A. No.72 of 2022 stands disposed of. Pending IAs, if any, stands disposed of. File be consigned to the Record Room after due compliance. Sd/- |
Closed | |
| rst - 09 | P.O. DRT-II |
Applicant
Respondent
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
