Disposed
Ms Laxmi Construction Company v. Cfm Asset Reconstruction Pvt. Ltd.
DRTSA/71/2022
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Disposed
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| 24.04.2026 | Exh. | Roznama-MDRT-II S.A. No.71 of 2022 |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mr Puneet Gogad, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr Neelanshu Roy, Advocate for Respondent. |
|||
| rst - 08 | 24 | Ld. Advocate for the Applicant filed consent terms (exhibit-24), which is taken on record. Ld. Advocate for the parties submits that the matter has been amicably settled as per consent terms (exhibit-24) and further submits that nothing survives in this S.A. In view of above submissions and consent terms (exhibit-24) filed, S.A. No.71 of 2022 stands disposed of. Pending IAs, if any, stands disposed of. File be consigned to the Record Room after due compliance. Sd/- P.O. DRT-II |
Closed |
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court