In this appeal against an order, the respondent bank admitted that the applicant's account is closed. Consequently, the Debts Recovery Tribunal disposed of the appeal without further proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/68/2025 SEES RAM Vs THE BAGHAT URBAN CO OPERATIVE BANK LTD
06.07.2026
Item No.20
Present: Mr. Gurinderjit Singh, Counsel for the Applicant. Mr. R.K. Jindal, Counsel for respondent bank (on VC). Mr. Jindal, admits that the account stands closed. In view of this, the SA stands disposed of .
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
PANKAJ
Sees Ram
The Baghat Urban Co Operative Bank Ltd
A S Narang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
