The Debts Recovery Tribunal disallowed a motion for refund of court fees on the grounds that the original appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
Counsel directed to refund court fees as per DRT Rules
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
MA/136/2025 IN OA/1580/2023 JAMMU AND KASHMIR BANK LIMITED Vs M/S AISHA TEXTILES 06.07.2026
Item No.124
Present: Mr. P.S. Sobti, Counsel for the Applicant Bank. None for respondents.
This is an MA filed by the applicant bank for refund of court fees in the OA, which was dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 14.12.2024. Accordingly, the Registrar is directed to refund the court fees as per the DRT Rules. MA stands disposed of .
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
PANKAJ
Jammu and Kashmir Bank Limited
M/s Aisha Textiles
A S Narang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
