Rakesh Ramchandra Pandey v. Union Bank of India
DRTSA/61/2022
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
| 20.02.2026 | Exh. | Roznama-MDRT-II S.A. No.61 of 2022 |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mr Sunil Humbre, Advocate for the Applicant. None for Respondent. |
|||
| rst – 42 | 18 | Ld. Advocate for the Applicant filed pursis (exhibit-18) and submits that the Respondent Bank has withdrawn the previous demand notice dated 07.04.2021. Now, the Applicant wants to file fresh S.A. regarding fresh demand notice and it can be disposed of. In the light of pursis (exhibit-18) and above submission made, S.A. No.61 of 2022 stands disposed of. Pending IAs, if any, stands disposed of. File be consigned to the Record Room after due compliance. Sd/- P.O. DRT-II |
Closed |
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Mr Sunil Humbre
- respondent
Respondent Bank
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court