The applicant sought to withdraw a Section 34 application as the underlying account dispute was settled, a request which was allowed by the Presiding Officer.
The Section 34 application stood disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 35
Case No.SA/590/2026
SATYA NARAYAN Vs CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA
Date: 01.07.2026
Proceedings through hybrid mode
Present:
Shri Ayush Sharma, Counsel for the Applicant
Shri Dhruva Rathore, Counsel for Respondent bank
Ld. Counsel for the applicant wants to withdraw this SA, as account has been settled.
Request is allowed.
As the applicant wants to withdraw this SA, therefore SA stands disposed of as withdrawn.
File be consigned to record as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
cm
SATYA NARAYAN
CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
