The Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur disposed of a Securitization Application as infructuous because the respondent bank stated the account was closed.
The Securitization Application was disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 42
Case No. SA/7/2025
OMPRAKASH YOGI Vs MOTILAL OSWAL HOME FINANCE LTD
Date: 29.06.2026.
Proceedings through hybrid mode Present:
None for the Applicant
Shri Akash Sharma, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI
Ld. Counsel for the respondent bank submitted that account stands closed and he prayed that the SA may be disposed of as infructuous.
Considering the submissions made by Ld. Counsel for the respondent bank and also considering the fact that none appeared on behalf of the SA applicant, this Securitization Application stands disposed of as infructuous.
File be consigned to record, as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Omrakash Yogi
Motilal Oswal Home Finance Ltd
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
