The impugned securities adjection was disposed of without any substantive order as the applicant withdrew the application to pursue the matter after regularizing the account.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/57/2026 NARINDER PAL Vs AU SMALL FINANCE BANK LIMITED
20.03.2026
Item No.15
Present: Mr. Satish Jaswal, Counsel for the Applicant. Ms.Prerna proxy Counsel for Ms. Deepika Mittal, Counsel for respondent bank.
Counsel for the Applicant states that the Applicant does not want to pursue the present SA, as he has regularized the account. The SA stands disposed of .
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
MANOJ
Narinder Pal
AU Small Finance Bank Limited
(A S Narang)
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
