In Debts Recovery Tribunal, Siliguri (SA/54/2026), the applicant failed to appear for the second hearing of the matter. The Presiding Officer allowed the respondent's counsel to state that the applicant lost interest, and the case was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ORDER SHEET
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, SILIGURI SA/54/2026
Parimal Saha & Anr Vs
Jana Small Finance Bank Ltd.
Applicant
Defendants
Office action with date and Date of Order with Signature dated Order signature of parties when necessary. Item No.23 Order No.09 27.08.2026
Present:
Counsel for the applicants : None.
Counsel for the respondent : Mr. Sagnik Bhowmick, virtual mode.
Hearing is made in hybrid mode.
No one appears for the applicant and on previous date of hearing also no one had participated in the hearing and thus list this matter for second call.
RAKESH Digitally signed by RAKESH PATI PATI TIWARI Date: 2026.08.28 TIWARI 18:29:54 +05'30' (RAKESH PATI TIWARI) Presiding Officer DRT-Siliguri
Later on:-
Counsel for the applicants : None.
Counsel for the respondent : Mr. Sagnik Bhowmick, virtual mode.
Hearing is made in hybrid mode.
The matter is called out for second time but no one appears for the applicant and as such it seems that the applicant has lost his interest in prosecution of this matter and accordingly the case is dismissed due to non-prosecution.
Let the file be consigned to the Record Room.
Order be uploaded in the website of the Tribunal.
RAKESH Digitally signed by RAKESH PATI PATI TIWARI Date: 2026.08.28 TIWARI 18:30:03 +05'30'
(RAKESH PATI TIWARI) Presiding Officer DRT-Siliguri
Parimal Saha & Anr
Jana Small Finance Bank Ltd.
RAKESH PATI TIWARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
