The Debts Recovery Tribunal allowed the Set-Appeal as infructuous after the appellant deposited the entire outstanding amount, thereby rendering the notice of sale futile.
Set-Appeal stands disposed of as infructuous due to deposit of full amount.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/309/2026 SANTOSH KUMARI Vs CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA
27.08.2026 Item No.29
Present: Mr. Rajnish Chauhan, Counsel for the Applicant. Mr.Devender Rattan, Counsel for respondent bank.
Counsel for the parties admit that the applicant has deposited the whole of the OTS amount. In view of this, the SA has been rendered infructuous and the same stands disposed of . File be consigned to the record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
MANOJ
Santosh Kumari
Central Bank of India
A S Narang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
