Disposed
Nirupma Thakur v. Himachal Pradesh Gramin Bank
DRTSA/41/2026
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Disposed
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/41/2026 NIRUPMA THAKUR Vs HIMACHAL PRADESH GRAMIN BANK
28.04.2026
Item No.20
Present: Mr. Arnav Kumar, Counsel for the applicant (on VC). Mr. R.K. Bansal, Counsel for respondent bank.
Counsel for the applicant states that the applicant has been restored to the possession and the SA has become infructuous. Accordingly, the SA stands disposed of .
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
PANKAJ
Nirupma Thakur
Himachal Pradesh Gramin Bank
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court