The DRT disposed of a securitization application as infructuous because the account between the applicant and respondent bank had been settled and closed.
The secutitization application stands disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 26
Case No. SA/407/2025
KHINV RAJ Vs AU SMALL FINANCE BANK LIMITED
Date: 05.02.2026.
Proceedings through hybrid mode
Present:
Shri Ritesh Kumawat, Counsel for the Applicant
Smt. Surbhi Bairathi, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI
Ld. Counsel for the respondent bank submitted that account stands settled and closed.
Considering the submissions made by Ld. Counsel for the respondent bank, this Securitization Application stands disposed of as infructuous.
File be consigned to record, as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Khinv Raj
AU Small Finance Bank Limited
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
