The National Lok Adalat at Hyderabad disposed of the applicant's claim as the applicant did not press the matter, resulting in the application being closed.
null
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOKADATAT
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERYTRIBUNAL.I AT HYDERABAD
DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026
PRESENTi
s.A.No.403,/2c25
Madala Venkata Srinivasa Rao S/o Late Krishna Mohan LB nagar, Ranga Reddy District.
... Applicant
Versus
Union Bank of India, High Court branch, Hyderabad.
... Respondent
Reference made by:-
Applicant Respondent Bank
Sri K. Kranthi Kumar Sri D.S. Pavan Kumar
.:AWARD:.
As the applicant not pressed the SA, the SA.No.4O3/2OZS is closed.
(Given under the hand and seal of the Lok Adalat Bench on this the 2gth day of March, 2026)
sd/-
sd/-
sd/-
(v. RAVTNDER)
Member
(N. TND|RA)
Member
(GUMMADI GOPI CHAND) PO /udicial Member
d,rW-
Madala Venkata Srinivasa Rao
Union Bank of India
Gummadi Gopinath Gopichand
V. Ravinder
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
