Reena v. Cent Bank Home Finance Limited
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-III, CHANDIGARH
ITEM NO. 47
SA/35/2025 REENA Vs CENT BANK HOME FINANCE LIMITED
24.02.2026
Present: Sh. Diwan Sharma, Advocate for Applicant Sh. Kirat Pal Dhaliwal, Advocate proxy for Ms. Priyanka Malik, Advocate for Respondent (already ex parte vide order dated 07.02.2026)
Sh. Diwan Sharma, Advocate argued on SA and further submitted that proceedings was proceeded ex parte against respondent vide order dated 07.02.2026.
Sh. Kirat Pal Dhaliwal, Advocate argued that respondent has withdrawn notice under Section 13(2) and 13(4) of the SARFAESI Act. Due to hearing and passing of orders in other urgent matters order could not be passed.
Put up on 28.02.2026 for final orders.
(MRIDULESH KUMAR SINGH) Presiding Officer DRT-III, Chandigarh
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Reena
- respondent
Cent Bank Home Finance Limited
Coram
Mridulesh Kumar Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court