In an application filed by VMST Logistics, the applicant failed to appear despite notice. The Presiding Officer dismissed the application in default as the applicant seemed uninterested in pursuing the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/345/2024 VMST LOGISTICS Vs SHRIRAM FINANCE LIMITED
27.08.2026 Item No.24
Present: None for the Applicant. Mr.Aditya Grover, Counsel for respondent FI (on VC).
This is third pass over since morning. Nobody is appearing on behalf of the applicant. It is already 03:00 p.m. It appears that applicant is not interested in pursuing this matter. Therefore, application filed by the applicant is dismissed in default .
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
MANOJ
VMST Logistics
Shriram Finance Limited
A S Narang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
