Ram Karanjat v. Idfc First Bank Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
Application disposed as infructuous on account of account closure and non-appearance by the applicant.
What did the court decide?
Application disposed of as infructuous.
What the court decided
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 20
Case No. SA/330/2025
RAM KARANJAT Vs IDFC FIRST BANK LTD
Date: 10.03.2026.
Proceedings through hybrid mode Present:
Shri Ramnaresh Vijay, Counsel for the Applicant
Shri Saransh Ghiya, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI
Ld. Counsel for the respondent bank submitted that account stands closed and he prayed that the SA may be disposed of as infructuous.
Considering the submissions made by Ld. Counsel for the respondent bank and also considering the fact that none appeared on behalf of the SA applicant, this Securitization Application stands disposed of as infructuous.
File be consigned to record, as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Ram Karanjat
- respondent
IDFC First Bank Ltd
Coram
Vimal Gupta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court