The Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur disposed of the present appeal as infructuous because the underlying account had been closed by the respondent bank, and also disposed of any pending interim applications.
The appeal was disposed of as infructuous; all pending interim applications were also disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 26
Case No.SA/286/2025
SMT RANAJITA SINGH Vs AU SMALL FINANCE BANK LIMITED SINGH
Date: 20.07.2026.
Proceedings through hybrid mode Present:
None for the Applicant
Shri Ayush Kumar Jain, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI
In this matter, Counsel for the Respondent submits that the account has been closed and SA may be disposed of as infractuous.
Considering the submission made by Counsel for the Respondent, SA stands disposed of as infractuous, all pending IAs also stands disposed of, if any.
File be consigned to record as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
cm
Ranajita Singh
AU Small Finance Bank Limited
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
