Securitization Application dismissed by the Debts Recovery Tribunal for non-prosecution as appellant's counsel pleaded lack of instructions. No substantive adjudication on merits.
Securitization Application stood dismissed on account of non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 44
Case No. SA/268/2022
MR BHIM SINGH JAT Vs JUMBO FINVEST INDIA LTD
Date: 01.04.2026.
Proceedings through hybrid mode Present:
Shri Vishwas Shukla, Counsel for the Applicant
Shri Pramod Kumar, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI
Counsel for the applicant Sh. Vishwas Shukla pleaded no instructions on behalf of the applicant. Therefore, this Securitization Application stands dismissed on account of nonprosecution.
File be consigned to record, as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
MR BHIM SINGH JAT
JUMBO FINVEST INDIA LTD
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
